L4: Day 5 Thursday

Today’s focus is on Faith in the Workplace. We watched an inspiring video and sermon by Julia Garschagen, which explored this theme throughout the Book of Acts. It reminded me that historically, ‘ordinary’ people living out their faith in their daily lives, especially those in migration, have played a more significant role in spreading the faith than the missionary movement. One interesting point Julia mentioned is that first-century Rabbis were required to have jobs!

The worship music has been fantastic and my table discussions enriching. This truly is a wonderful picture and experience of the global Church.

--

I have heard some criticism about The Seoul Statement and what it includes and doesn’t include. For instance, Ted Esler says:

What surprised me was not what it said, but what it did not say. There is no significant emphasis on evangelism.

Similarly, Ed Stetzer says this:

I’m appealing (and have appealed) to the leadership of Lausanne that we state emphatically that evangelism is “central,” “a priority,” and “indispensable” to our mission. History has shown over and over that a mission that doesn’t prioritize evangelism will quickly lose evangelism.

And another one, Tim Tennent:

I do have a few serious questions about Lausanne 4. First, has it become so “issues” driven that the central emphasis on world evangelization has been buried down to just one emphasis among many? Is the driving purpose of Lausanne still the driving purpose?

After a long dinner with one of the authors of the statement, I think I have some clarity. The Cape Town Commitment from L3 was an incredible document, used all around the globe for training, but not so much in the English-speaking world since we already have so many quality resources. What makes L4 unique is the State of the Great Commission Report, a 500+ page document that:

shares insights from more than 150 global mission experts and sheds light on how we as a global church can be obedient to Jesus’ Great Commission today.

So I do think it is clear that Lausanne is keeping the main thing the main thing. But since The State of the GC Report discusses so many aspects of mission, the Seoul Statement is really less missional in focus and intended more as a theological document for important issues of the day.

Therefore, I’m a bit less concerned than the three missiologists quoted above – actually, what I would prefer to hear more of is a focus on disciple-making.

For instance, when we look at the mission of Christ, our paradigmatic example, where can we discern a difference between discipleship and evangelism? That is my point. The world needs more disciples and not simply converts, and L4’s focus on the Great Commission thoroughly covers holistic disciple-making.

To that end, I don’t see a need to protest the Seoul Statement, especially since it should be read alongside the State of the Great Commission Report.

--

Honestly, most everyone I spoke with today was tired (many sore throats), and there are two more days to go! I attempted to take a walk but bumped into too many wonderful colleagues, so I didn’t get a rest. Eventually though, I found my way to the prayer room and spent some time meditating and praying.

I found myself grappling with my own sin and shortcomings. It is so easy for me to be cynical and judgmental, especially after yesterday’s controversy. I repented for any part I have played in the mess. It’s really no wonder that the New Testament letters address so many ugly complexities of our relationships within the body of Christ. It is also too easy to give up.

The Church is indeed messy, and we all need Jesus to wash our dirty feet. This is my soul searching in Seoul - I am committed to seeking reconciliation and striving to be more Christlike in my actions and attitudes.

While it is important to acknowledge the historical and cultural complexities that shape our global evangelical events, I also believe that these gatherings can be opportunities for genuine fellowship and mutual edification. It is crucial to listen to diverse voices and perspectives, ensuring that we do not perpetuate any form of dominance or exclusion.

Ultimately, our focus should be engaging in ways that reflect Christ’s love and humility. Let us strive to build bridges of understanding and unity, rather than walls of division, cynicism, and judgment. “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another” (Jn. 13:35). The world is watching.

L4: Day 4 Wednesday

Today’s theme is Persecution and Mission. Acts 8:1-4 & 11:19-26 was wonderfully expounded by Patrick Fung. Two key quotes:

• Here is a gospel movement by God’s people, the unknown, unnamed, uncelebrated, ordinary disciples of Christ.
• They lived to be forgotten so that Christ would be remembered.

Many stories this morning of persecution and suffering, from China, India, and Iran primarily. The talk from Iran was particularly engaging and edifying. Although I would nuance the missiology being presented, I appreciate that they are not romanticizing persecution.

--

For me, there is not much new information so far. The overall theme of L4 is “collaboration.” In the CP interest group, the theme was “Collaborate to Saturate.” The Lausanne App, which we are all required to use, is being promoted often as a tool for collaboration.

I actually do much collaboration in my ministry, and Motus Dei met today actually where we discussed our upcoming MQ (Movemental Intelligence) Symposium in May 2025.

--

I attended an excellent breakout group led well by Cory Hartman of New Generations on Disciple Making Movements. He tried out some unpublished thoughts that were not ready for “prime time.” Here is his definition of DMM:

A DMM is 1) a chain reaction, 2) of ordinary people, 3) multiplying disciples who obey, 4) through their natural social networks, 5) manifesting as generations of gatherings spawning gatherings (gatherings can be DBSs or churches), 6) that maintains its quality without depending on the ones who started it.

A DMM is more specific than a move of God, more specific than a gospel movement, and more specific than a people movement, and is a bit different than a church planting movement.

The meeting was well attended. I find it fascinating that so many people have no idea about movements today. And also that so many people here just continue to operate from within a Protestant micro-Christendom ecclesiology.

--

So if you were waiting for some controversy of L4, here is perhaps the first one. At the beginning of the week, Ruth Padilla DeBorst gave a wonderful message on injustice. (Side note: prophets often pay a price for their words.) The point of contention was this statement from her talk:

what makes God’s people such are not superficial expressions of religious piety, ‘Christianese’ jargon, worship jingles, or colonialist theologies that justify and finance oppression under the guise of some dispensational eschatology.

Apparently, that was enough for some to protest to the conference organizers who then offered an apology:

As Congress Director, I would like to offer an apology for a presentation this week which singled out ‘dispensational eschatology’ in a critical tone, implying that it contributed to violence and injustice, and which failed to note that many theologies have been misused and misapplied as justifications for violence. That same presentation referred to the suffering of the Palestinian people, but did not express comparable empathy for the suffering of Israeli people, nor adequately express concern for many other peoples and nations of the world that are currently in the throes of violent conflict.

I have thoughts. The wording of the email apology was quite nuanced. Dispensationalists don't feel their theology is oppressive. Whether we agree or not is beside the point. Lausanne tries hard to be big tent Evangelicalism – not an easy task.

A second thought: is Zionist Dispensational theology inherently oppressive by nature to Palestinians? By way of analogy, is boxing a violent sport? I suppose it depends on your perspective. L4’s ‘apology’ can be seen as silencing Ruth’s prophetic voice. Many here do not feel that an apology was necessary nor consistent because other speakers who have also offered insight which others might find offensive. For example, no one is apologizing for throwing cessationism under the bus on Monday!

Ruth then penned an open letter to L4 (forwarded many times on WhatsApp) that I thought was an important response. The whole controversy has been covered already at the Christian Post where you can read the email from L4 and Ruth’s response in their entirety. (NB: I do not think The Christian Post is a professional or unbiased news source; I only share this link because they are the first to report on this, from what I can tell.)

L4: Day 3 Tuesday

Today is the 50^th birthday of Lausanne(!!!), and the theme for today is “Missional Community.” This morning’s exposition was done by Anne Zaki (a colleague at The Evangelical Seminary of Cairo) who skillfully unpacked a ton of profound insights from Acts 15. A Pakistani woman remarked to me how pleasantly shocked she was to see so many women of color on stage – and preaching at that!

--

Yesterday was a very difficult day in Lebanon. Many Lebanese colleagues are here and understandably distracted, as am I.

--

From the stage, I do hear the word “revival” a lot in the presentations. By contrast, one highlight for me was Dale Stephenson, a pastor in Australia, gave a simple explanation of DMM without saying DMM: disciple people to faith, look for a person of peace, and discovery bible studies. He hit many of the main points in an engaging way. The fact that he related it to his post-Christian Australian context was perhaps more appropriate for this audience. Yet we do see revivals and awakenings sometimes in the world. Upon reflection, perhaps revivalism is part of the legacy of Billy Graham who was a cofounder of Lausanne. But I am reasonably obsessed about movements.

--

I attended a workshop done by Rick Warren entitled, “How to Finish the Task.” He began his talk by claiming that he has never had a scandal and also that Saddleback is the most successful missionary sending church in history. He also said his mentor was Billy Graham. Honestly, Rick gave around 4 sermons in one talk.

Rick wants people to go to places that have no believer, no Bible, and no Body of Christ. (Rick is the king of catchy epithets.) From what I gather, Rick claims if we collaborate and re-evangelize all the nominal Christians in the world, then we can reach the rest of the world if they, in turn, make disciples: the southern hemisphere must re-evangelize the northern hemisphere. (Yes I sensed the disconnect too. Maybe this is what you get when you combine sermons?)

Some quotes from Rick though which I thought were interesting:

The business of Christianity is moving people from “come and see” to “come and die.”

Rabbits don’t have menstrual cycles, they can get pregnant 5 seconds after giving birth. This is the house church. If we are going to finish the Great Commission, we need 10s of millions of rabbit churches. We only need megachurches in megacities.

The moment we start building church buildings, the growth of the church will decline.

The church at its birth is the church at its best. You don’t need a new model; you need the first model.

What God did in the first century, we want him to do it in the 21st century.

--

The interest group I attended yesterday was “Church Planting.” They are promoting Saturation Church Planting as a goal (churches everywhere), not a methodology. You can read more about the CP issue network here.

--

The “Gap” I attended was Islam. At my table was Keith Swartley, David Garrison, Joshua Lingel, and a couple MBBs. A great question for missiological imagination we discussed:

For significant progress towards fulfilling the Great Commission among Muslims, what needs to happen by 2050?

--

Much focus on integrity, spirituality, proclamation evangelism, and reaching the unreached. Michael Oh again mentioned the legacy of Ralph Winter, but not Rene Padilla. I imagine the integral mission crowd is feeling a bit marginalized (I heard a group here wrote a strong negative response to the Seoul Statement). Although I personally have been mostly satisfied with the overall balance. I am trying to learn, listen, and be humble.

L4: Day 2 Monday

In L3 Cape Town 2010 we studied Ephesians – each of the 6 days featured an exposition on one chapter. Here in L4, we have six days though the book of Acts.

There is too much to summarize, but the focus today is the Holy Spirit, and there is a strong Pentecostal flavor. I imagine cessationists would feel a bit awkward at the teaching today.

In three of the talks, there is a focus on revivalism à la Acts 2. Tied to this has been the (unintentional?) featuring of megachurches as a result of revivals. As movements spread primarily through microchurches, I’m personally feeling a bit of a disconnect. And I think Luke’s emphasis on the Holy Spirit is a bit different than revivalism. Yes the HS manifests in sensational ways, and everything in Acts seems to be happening in movements today. Well, except institutional megachurches.

There was also an example from one of the speakers to make sure that by 2033 (2000 years after the resurrection), every person has an opportunity to experience Christ. I think this is laudable, but it also continues the human tendency for goal setting by using prominent dates. I wonder what God thinks of our plans. They seem to motivate and provide a sense of urgency, but…

Today I also had lunch and dinner with Trinity Evangelical Divinity School students, alumni, and faculty. In many ways, the relationship between Trinity and Lausanne is intertwined and the two share a similar ethos.

In the evening session, Vaugh Roberts gave a beautiful defense of traditional views of marriage. Interestingly, the Seoul Statement also includes a strong statement on biblical sexuality as between one man and one woman in marriage. In Cape Town, there was a survey for participants on different theological views, and I remember being shocked at how many American attendees were affirming homosexual practice as normative in God’s design. The American view was in stark contrast with the Majority world view on sexuality which is much more traditional. In many ways, I think the Western promotion same-sex marriage is an example of neocolonialism.

So far, the non-Western flavor of the event has been clear. There is more emphasis on integral mission, reaching the unreached, less cerebral and more experiential faith, and on affirming God’s goodness in human sexuality within traditional marriage. American evangelicalism can sometimes feel a bit odd in the global scene.

L4 Seoul: Day 1

I’m here in Incheon, South Korea for Lausanne 4. The theme this round is is “Let the Church Declare and Display Christ Together.” I’ve decided to blog about each day (Like I did for Lausanne 3 in Cape Town), just offering some unrefined thoughts through the fog of jetlag. Please evaluate my writing and analysis in that light!

This morning I toured the Korean DMZ and went deep inside Tunnel #3. Pretty amazing stuff.

I had a fun dinner with Emanuel Prinz, Ed Stetzer, and David Garrison. Then walked into the main hall for all 5,000 attendees from over 200 countries. The room is very nice with a huge curved screen (80 meters wide) and digitally very impressive with wonderful Korean worship. Interestingly, I have bumped into dozens of friends and colleagues which is really fun for someone who works for home these days.

Of all the main speakers on this first evening, none were Western. One of the thoughts going through my mind was how Lausanne would deal with the word “mission.” For some, it is reductionistic to claim that mission is about “reaching the unreached.” For others, “Fulfilling the Great Commission” is basically the totality of mission.

CEO and Lausanne Executive Director, Michael Oh, is a Korean American. Wearing a traditional Korean robe, he described Incheon as the first place missionaries landed and established churches on the Korean Peninsula, and his mother still attends the first the church established by said missionaries. Importantly, Oh’s focus was on the importance of workplace ministry, meaning that everyone has a role to play in mission. However, he also said that Christians being faithful in their vocations/settings is simply not enough to fulfill the Great Commission; we need to go to the unreached as well. I thought it was a good balance.

I am curious what tomorrow holds after this opening session. There are “Gaps” and “Issue Networks.” The two I have signed up for are Islam and Church Planting, respectively.

You can also watch LIVE: https://congress.lausanne.org/live/

Today, the Seoul Statement was released. I am curious why it is so long, as I thought the Cape Town Committment was still very much a relevant document. I will be interested and seeing some analysis between the two.

The Graying (and Browning) of Frontier Missiology

Last year I wrote a post that received some attention and I offered it for publication with Mission Frontiers. They asked that I expand on it for an issue on “People Group Theory” which was just published.

So here it is:

The Graying (and Browning) of Frontier Missiology

(Here is the PDF on Academia.)

Be sure to check out the whole issue which is filled with brief, diverse missiological takes on the concept of “people groups.”