Here is yet another post and a video from the blog Biblical Missiology that is extremely anti “insider” and anti C4/5. Unfortunately, the video picks on a few extreme examples and misunderstands, misrepresents, and over-generalizes the C4/5 position.
Biblical Missiology may have some serious concerns and valid points, but it doesn’t help create dialogue and understanding to label those who disagree with them “heretical.” Imagine if all the Calvinists/Arminians, Presbyterians/Baptists, Cessationists/Charismatics called the other a “heretic!”
A couple questions:
- Do you think polarizing videos and posts like this from traditionalists help their cause, or hurt it?
- Can you provide any examples of someone who embraces the Insider or C5 position presenting the traditionalist position in such a mean-spirited fashion? Why do you think that is?