From September 22-28, 2024, I had the privilege of attending The Fourth Lausanne Congress in South Korea and blogged my thoughts and summaries each day. To make it easier for you to follow along and revisit the key moments, I’ve compiled all my daily posts below. This way, you can explore the insights, reflections, and highlights from each day at your own pace.
Friday’s theme was “Leadership and Servanthood.” The text was Acts 20:13-38. Philip Ryken, President of Wheaton College and a good basketball player (so I hear), was the speaker. “Serving the Way of Jesus” was the title and a much-needed reminder.
A highlight for me was Rula Khoury Mansoura, Palestinian Christian lawyer from Israel, who spoke about living as a second-class citizen in her own land and processed issues of justice and reconciliation though that light. She called the L4 Congress to stand with her for peace-building in Israel-Palestine. Honestly, I don’t think many people even know that Palestinian Christians exist.
Today (Friday) Conference Organizer David Bennett wisely emailed all L4 participants the letter written by Ruth Padilla DeBorst from the controversy of Wednesday. Interestingly, this controversy has really served to highlight the plight of Palestinians and issues surrounding dispensational Zionism within Evangelicalism. Yet there is still a lot of work to do.
After living in the Middle East and working with several Palestinian colleagues and students, this issue has been close to my heart. Even as I write this, the IDF continues their attacks on Lebanon. It is heartbreaking. Pray for the Lebanese Church who is stepping up to serve many internally displaced peoples from the South.
One of my favorite resources for understanding the Israel-Palestinian conflict through a theological lens is Skye Jethani’s interview with Gary Burge on YouTube.
--
Saturday’s theme was “The Gospel to the Ends of the Earth Under Christ’s Reign.” The sermon was given by Ronaldo Lidório, a Brazilian church planter in the Amazon. Five waves of reaching the unreached in the first century:
There was further emphasis on Ralph Winter’s Legacy today in in bringing awareness of unreached peoples. One comment was interesting to me: churches who do not send missionaries have little spirituality to offer the world.
Unfortunately, there has been some unnecessary noise concerning the Seoul Statement. I found this article from CT to be helpful and edifying. The Great Commission belongs to the Global Church.
--
Some Final Thoughts on L4
There has been a kaleidoscope of topics this week, as L4 is about “collaboration” (not missiology) and very issue-driven. Previous Lausanne events have been criticized for being all talk and no action.
The overall impetus of L4 leads towards the holistic discipling of all peoples for the exaltation of Jesus. In that sense, both the apostolic and indicative aspects of mission have been addressed, although it is indeed impossible to please everyone. For example, sometimes my kids make fun of me for being old – and I’m upset that the Seoul Statement didn’t address ageism! (Hopefully you get my sarcasm.)
Floating around the congress, at least in my circles, have been a couple petitions of the Seoul Statement. But petitions should really be last resorts when dialogue has failed. I considered linking to them here but decided against it. At the least, people care deeply about the direction of Lausanne as it plays a large role in global Evangelicalism.
I’ll just offer a couple more thoughts and then take a break from blogging for a while.
MBBs. I don’t think there has been a single MBB on stage or leading an interest group. Many Arab CBB Arab leaders are here. I believe the situation in L5 will be different. The Muslim background Church will reach the Muslim world – we have much to learn from them. In my “Islam” gap, conversations were still quite basic.
Pastors. Even though the workplace track was highlighted often, with over 1,500 participants, there is still an emphasis on Pastors and pastoral ministry in context of attractional churches. Even missionaries are envisioned in a pastoral role – preaching to unbelievers. For me, the office of Pastor in a local church is a remnant of Christendom. We need more work on the APEST (Eph 4:11) leadership distribution and vision.
Movements. With the incredible explosion of Christianity in the Majority World there is much to celebrate. I wouldn’t say that movements are the only or even the primary way God is working today. With that being said, there is still an over-emphasis on institutional ecclesiology and even big flashy success stories like revivals. These are important, but we must find ways to increase movemental intelligence in the body of Christ.
Furthermore, the old social justice vs evangelism debate is still happening with different tribes feeling marginalized at different times and in different ways (Lausanne is either seen as too evangelistic or too social justice oriented depending on who you ask – maybe this is the sweet spot?). But I believe movements – especially as they manifest in the Majority World – seem to solve this tension.
The Acts of the Apostles and the Holy Spirit. Immersing in Acts reminds us that the early church’s faith should be our guiding blueprint:
Acts 28:30-31: For two whole years Paul stayed there in his own rented house and welcomed all who came to see him. He proclaimed the kingdom of God and taught about the Lord Jesus Christ—with all boldness and without hindrance.
Today’s focus is on Faith in the Workplace. We watched an inspiring video and sermon by Julia Garschagen, which explored this theme throughout the Book of Acts. It reminded me that historically, ‘ordinary’ people living out their faith in their daily lives, especially those in migration, have played a more significant role in spreading the faith than the missionary movement. One interesting point Julia mentioned is that first-century Rabbis were required to have jobs!
The worship music has been fantastic and my table discussions enriching. This truly is a wonderful picture and experience of the global Church.
--
I have heard some criticism about The Seoul Statement and what it includes and doesn’t include. For instance, Ted Esler says:
What surprised me was not what it said, but what it did not say. There is no significant emphasis on evangelism.
Similarly, Ed Stetzer says this:
I’m appealing (and have appealed) to the leadership of Lausanne that we state emphatically that evangelism is “central,” “a priority,” and “indispensable” to our mission. History has shown over and over that a mission that doesn’t prioritize evangelism will quickly lose evangelism.
And another one, Tim Tennent:
I do have a few serious questions about Lausanne 4. First, has it become so “issues” driven that the central emphasis on world evangelization has been buried down to just one emphasis among many? Is the driving purpose of Lausanne still the driving purpose?
After a long dinner with one of the authors of the statement, I think I have some clarity. The Cape Town Commitment from L3 was an incredible document, used all around the globe for training, but not so much in the English-speaking world since we already have so many quality resources. What makes L4 unique is the State of the Great Commission Report, a 500+ page document that:
shares insights from more than 150 global mission experts and sheds light on how we as a global church can be obedient to Jesus’ Great Commission today.
So I do think it is clear that Lausanne is keeping the main thing the main thing. But since The State of the GC Report discusses so many aspects of mission, the Seoul Statement is really less missional in focus and intended more as a theological document for important issues of the day.
Therefore, I’m a bit less concerned than the three missiologists quoted above – actually, what I would prefer to hear more of is a focus on disciple-making.
For instance, when we look at the mission of Christ, our paradigmatic example, where can we discern a difference between discipleship and evangelism? That is my point. The world needs more disciples and not simply converts, and L4’s focus on the Great Commission thoroughly covers holistic disciple-making.
To that end, I don’t see a need to protest the Seoul Statement, especially since it should be read alongside the State of the Great Commission Report.
--
Honestly, most everyone I spoke with today was tired (many sore throats), and there are two more days to go! I attempted to take a walk but bumped into too many wonderful colleagues, so I didn’t get a rest. Eventually though, I found my way to the prayer room and spent some time meditating and praying.
I found myself grappling with my own sin and shortcomings. It is so easy for me to be cynical and judgmental, especially after yesterday’s controversy. I repented for any part I have played in the mess. It’s really no wonder that the New Testament letters address so many ugly complexities of our relationships within the body of Christ. It is also too easy to give up.
The Church is indeed messy, and we all need Jesus to wash our dirty feet. This is my soul searching in Seoul - I am committed to seeking reconciliation and striving to be more Christlike in my actions and attitudes.
While it is important to acknowledge the historical and cultural complexities that shape our global evangelical events, I also believe that these gatherings can be opportunities for genuine fellowship and mutual edification. It is crucial to listen to diverse voices and perspectives, ensuring that we do not perpetuate any form of dominance or exclusion.
Ultimately, our focus should be engaging in ways that reflect Christ’s love and humility. Let us strive to build bridges of understanding and unity, rather than walls of division, cynicism, and judgment. “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another” (Jn. 13:35). The world is watching.
Today’s theme is Persecution and Mission. Acts 8:1-4 & 11:19-26 was wonderfully expounded by Patrick Fung. Two key quotes:
Many stories this morning of persecution and suffering, from China, India, and Iran primarily. The talk from Iran was particularly engaging and edifying. Although I would nuance the missiology being presented, I appreciate that they are not romanticizing persecution.
--
For me, there is not much new information so far. The overall theme of L4 is “collaboration.” In the CP interest group, the theme was “Collaborate to Saturate.” The Lausanne App, which we are all required to use, is being promoted often as a tool for collaboration.
I actually do much collaboration in my ministry, and Motus Dei met today actually where we discussed our upcoming MQ (Movemental Intelligence) Symposium in May 2025.
--
I attended an excellent breakout group led well by Cory Hartman of New Generations on Disciple Making Movements. He tried out some unpublished thoughts that were not ready for “prime time.” Here is his definition of DMM:
A DMM is 1) a chain reaction, 2) of ordinary people, 3) multiplying disciples who obey, 4) through their natural social networks, 5) manifesting as generations of gatherings spawning gatherings (gatherings can be DBSs or churches), 6) that maintains its quality without depending on the ones who started it.
A DMM is more specific than a move of God, more specific than a gospel movement, and more specific than a people movement, and is a bit different than a church planting movement.
The meeting was well attended. I find it fascinating that so many people have no idea about movements today. And also that so many people here just continue to operate from within a Protestant micro-Christendom ecclesiology.
--
So if you were waiting for some controversy of L4, here is perhaps the first one. At the beginning of the week, Ruth Padilla DeBorst gave a wonderful message on injustice. (Side note: prophets often pay a price for their words.) The point of contention was this statement from her talk:
what makes God’s people such are not superficial expressions of religious piety, ‘Christianese’ jargon, worship jingles, or colonialist theologies that justify and finance oppression under the guise of some dispensational eschatology.
Apparently, that was enough for some to protest to the conference organizers who then offered an apology:
As Congress Director, I would like to offer an apology for a presentation this week which singled out ‘dispensational eschatology’ in a critical tone, implying that it contributed to violence and injustice, and which failed to note that many theologies have been misused and misapplied as justifications for violence. That same presentation referred to the suffering of the Palestinian people, but did not express comparable empathy for the suffering of Israeli people, nor adequately express concern for many other peoples and nations of the world that are currently in the throes of violent conflict.
I have thoughts. The wording of the email apology was quite nuanced. Dispensationalists don't feel their theology is oppressive. Whether we agree or not is beside the point. Lausanne tries hard to be big tent Evangelicalism – not an easy task.
A second thought: is Zionist Dispensational theology inherently oppressive by nature to Palestinians? By way of analogy, is boxing a violent sport? I suppose it depends on your perspective. L4’s ‘apology’ can be seen as silencing Ruth’s prophetic voice. Many here do not feel that an apology was necessary nor consistent because other speakers who have also offered insight which others might find offensive. For example, no one is apologizing for throwing cessationism under the bus on Monday!
Ruth then penned an open letter to L4 (forwarded many times on WhatsApp) that I thought was an important response. The whole controversy has been covered already at the Christian Post where you can read the email from L4 and Ruth’s response in their entirety. (NB: I do not think The Christian Post is a professional or unbiased news source; I only share this link because they are the first to report on this, from what I can tell.)
Today is the 50th birthday of Lausanne(!!!), and the theme for today is “Missional Community.” This morning’s exposition was done by Anne Zaki (a colleague at The Evangelical Seminary of Cairo) who skillfully unpacked a ton of profound insights from Acts 15. A Pakistani woman remarked to me how pleasantly shocked she was to see so many women of color on stage – and preaching at that!
--
Yesterday was a very difficult day in Lebanon. Many Lebanese colleagues are here and understandably distracted, as am I.
--
From the stage, I do hear the word “revival” a lot in the presentations. By contrast, one highlight for me was Dale Stephenson, a pastor in Australia, gave a simple explanation of DMM without saying DMM: disciple people to faith, look for a person of peace, and discovery bible studies. He hit many of the main points in an engaging way. The fact that he related it to his post-Christian Australian context was perhaps more appropriate for this audience. Yet we do see revivals and awakenings sometimes in the world. Upon reflection, perhaps revivalism is part of the legacy of Billy Graham who was a cofounder of Lausanne. But I am reasonably obsessed about movements.
--
I attended a workshop done by Rick Warren entitled, “How to Finish the Task.” He began his talk by claiming that he has never had a scandal and also that Saddleback is the most successful missionary sending church in history. He also said his mentor was Billy Graham. Honestly, Rick gave around 4 sermons in one talk.
Rick wants people to go to places that have no believer, no Bible, and no Body of Christ. (Rick is the king of catchy epithets.) From what I gather, Rick claims if we collaborate and re-evangelize all the nominal Christians in the world, then we can reach the rest of the world if they, in turn, make disciples: the southern hemisphere must re-evangelize the northern hemisphere. (Yes I sensed the disconnect too. Maybe this is what you get when you combine sermons?)
Some quotes from Rick though which I thought were interesting:
The business of Christianity is moving people from “come and see” to “come and die.”
Rabbits don’t have menstrual cycles, they can get pregnant 5 seconds after giving birth. This is the house church. If we are going to finish the Great Commission, we need 10s of millions of rabbit churches. We only need megachurches in megacities.
The moment we start building church buildings, the growth of the church will decline.
The church at its birth is the church at its best. You don’t need a new model; you need the first model.
What God did in the first century, we want him to do it in the 21st century.
--
The interest group I attended yesterday was “Church Planting.” They are promoting Saturation Church Planting as a goal (churches everywhere), not a methodology. You can read more about the CP issue network here.
--
The “Gap” I attended was Islam. At my table was Keith Swartley, David Garrison, Joshua Lingel, and a couple MBBs. A great question for missiological imagination we discussed:
For significant progress towards fulfilling the Great Commission among Muslims, what needs to happen by 2050?
--
Much focus on integrity, spirituality, proclamation evangelism, and reaching the unreached. Michael Oh again mentioned the legacy of Ralph Winter, but not Rene Padilla. I imagine the integral mission crowd is feeling a bit marginalized (I heard a group here wrote a strong negative response to the Seoul Statement). Although I personally have been mostly satisfied with the overall balance. I am trying to learn, listen, and be humble.
In L3 Cape Town 2010 we studied Ephesians – each of the 6 days featured an exposition on one chapter. Here in L4, we have six days though the book of Acts.
There is too much to summarize, but the focus today is the Holy Spirit, and there is a strong Pentecostal flavor. I imagine cessationists would feel a bit awkward at the teaching today.
In three of the talks, there is a focus on revivalism à la Acts 2. Tied to this has been the (unintentional?) featuring of megachurches as a result of revivals. As movements spread primarily through microchurches, I’m personally feeling a bit of a disconnect. And I think Luke’s emphasis on the Holy Spirit is a bit different than revivalism. Yes the HS manifests in sensational ways, and everything in Acts seems to be happening in movements today. Well, except institutional megachurches.
There was also an example from one of the speakers to make sure that by 2033 (2000 years after the resurrection), every person has an opportunity to experience Christ. I think this is laudable, but it also continues the human tendency for goal setting by using prominent dates. I wonder what God thinks of our plans. They seem to motivate and provide a sense of urgency, but…
Today I also had lunch and dinner with Trinity Evangelical Divinity School students, alumni, and faculty. In many ways, the relationship between Trinity and Lausanne is intertwined and the two share a similar ethos.
In the evening session, Vaugh Roberts gave a beautiful defense of traditional views of marriage. Interestingly, the Seoul Statement also includes a strong statement on biblical sexuality as between one man and one woman in marriage. In Cape Town, there was a survey for participants on different theological views, and I remember being shocked at how many American attendees were affirming homosexual practice as normative in God’s design. The American view was in stark contrast with the Majority world view on sexuality which is much more traditional. In many ways, I think the Western promotion same-sex marriage is an example of neocolonialism.
So far, the non-Western flavor of the event has been clear. There is more emphasis on integral mission, reaching the unreached, less cerebral and more experiential faith, and on affirming God’s goodness in human sexuality within traditional marriage. American evangelicalism can sometimes feel a bit odd in the global scene.
I’m here in Incheon, South Korea for Lausanne 4. The theme this round is is “Let the Church Declare and Display Christ Together.” I’ve decided to blog about each day (Like I did for Lausanne 3 in Cape Town), just offering some unrefined thoughts through the fog of jetlag. Please evaluate my writing and analysis in that light!
This morning I toured the Korean DMZ and went deep inside Tunnel #3. Pretty amazing stuff.
I had a fun dinner with Emanuel Prinz, Ed Stetzer, and David Garrison. Then walked into the main hall for all 5,000 attendees from over 200 countries. The room is very nice with a huge curved screen (80 meters wide) and digitally very impressive with wonderful Korean worship. Interestingly, I have bumped into dozens of friends and colleagues which is really fun for someone who works for home these days.
Of all the main speakers on this first evening, none were Western. One of the thoughts going through my mind was how Lausanne would deal with the word “mission.” For some, it is reductionistic to claim that mission is about “reaching the unreached.” For others, “Fulfilling the Great Commission” is basically the totality of mission.
CEO and Lausanne Executive Director, Michael Oh, is a Korean American. Wearing a traditional Korean robe, he described Incheon as the first place missionaries landed and established churches on the Korean Peninsula, and his mother still attends the first the church established by said missionaries. Importantly, Oh’s focus was on the importance of workplace ministry, meaning that everyone has a role to play in mission. However, he also said that Christians being faithful in their vocations/settings is simply not enough to fulfill the Great Commission; we need to go to the unreached as well. I thought it was a good balance.
I am curious what tomorrow holds after this opening session. There are “Gaps” and “Issue Networks.” The two I have signed up for are Islam and Church Planting, respectively.
You can also watch LIVE: https://congress.lausanne.org/live/
Today, the Seoul Statement was released. I am curious why it is so long, as I thought the Cape Town Committment was still very much a relevant document. I will be interested and seeing some analysis between the two.
This 14 minute documentary gives an overview of the Lausanne Movement's Cape Town 2010 Congress held in October 2010.
The Third Lausanne Congress on World Evangelization (Cape Town, 16-25 October 2010) brought together 4,200 evangelical leaders from 198 countries, and extended to hundreds of thousands more, participating in meetings around the world, and online. Its goal? To bring a fresh challenge to the global Church to bear witness to Jesus Christ and all his teaching - in every nation, in every sphere of society, and in the realm of ideas.
The Cape Town Commitment is the fruit of this endeavour. It stands in an historic line, building on both The Lausanne Covenant and The Manila Manifesto. It is in two parts. Part l sets out biblical convictions, passed down to us in the scriptures, and Part ll sounds the call to action.
The Cape Town Commitment
Preamble
PART II - FOR THE WORLD WE SERVE: The Cape Town Call to Action
- We love because God first loved us
- We love the living God
- We love God the Father
- We love God the Son
- We love God the Holy Spirit
- We love God’s Word
- We love God’s world
- We love the gospel of God
- We love the people of God
- We love the mission of God
Introduction
Conclusion
- Bearing witness to the truth of Christ in a pluralistic, globalized world
- Building the peace of Christ in our divided and broken world
- Living the love of Christ among people of other faiths
- Discerning the will of Christ for world evangelization
- Calling the Church of Christ back to humility, integrity and simplicity
- Partnering in the body of Christ for unity in mission
Farshid Fathi, who was with us at Cape Town 2010, was recently arrested by Iranian authorities because of his Christian faith. He was one of 70 Iranian believers arrested by government security forces on 26 December. According to Elam Ministries, Farshid, like the thirteen others still being held, has been in solitary confinement and subjected to numerous hours of interrogation.Without a doubt, this was one of the key moments at Lausanne.
Posted at Desiring God:
On Lausanne's website, John Piper's exposition of Ephesians 3 is among the most watched, most discussed, and highest rated sessions from last month's congress in Cape Town. I mention that only to suggest that what he says in it has really struck a cord with those who've heard it.
It was an important and timely word. If you're interested in hearing it yourself, you can now watch or read it on our website.
The high point of the message is when Piper makes this plea to listeners (pardon the length—the context is necessary):
If God had not put Christ forward to bear his own wrath, if Christ had not become a curse for us, as Galatians 3:13 says, then all the nations and all Jews would have perished under God’s wrath and entered into everlasting suffering in hell, as Jesus said in Matthew 25:46.
The reason I draw out this implication of the cross is to hold together in this congress and in the church of Christ two truths that are often felt to be at odds with each other, but don’t have to be.
One truth is that when the gospel takes root in our souls it impels us out toward the alleviation of all unjust suffering in this age. That’s what love does!
The other truth is that when the gospel takes root in our souls it awakens us to the horrible reality of eternal suffering in hell, under the wrath of a just and omnipotent God. And it impels us to rescue the perishing, and to warn people to flee from the wrath to come (1 Thessalonians 1:10).
I plead with you. Don’t choose between those two truths. Embrace them both. It doesn’t mean we all spend our time in the same way. God forbid. But it means we let the Bible define reality and define love.
Could Lausanne say—could the evangelical church say—we Christians care about all suffering, especially eternal suffering? I hope we can say that. But if we feel resistant to saying “especially eternal suffering,” or if we feel resistant to saying “we care about all suffering in this age,” then either we have a defective view of hell or a defective heart.
I pray that Lausanne would have neither.
